šŸ“‘ How Science Got Sound Wrong

Bookmarked How Science Got Sound Wrong (fairobserver.com)

In this edition of Tech Turncoat Truths, William Softky asks whether analog LP records are more authentic than digitally compressed sound.

William Softky unpacks the question as to whether vinyl is better than digital? This includes providing a history of recorded sound, from the phonograph, to the radio, to stereo. He suggests the difference relates to the how and what of listening:

Headphones and earbuds, being smaller and quieter, do indeed give better sound per dollar, but they move with your head and remove the bass notes from your skin. Digital CDs ā€” being digitized but not otherwise compressed ā€” still sounded nearly perfect to me, but not so MP3s, AACs and, later, streaming, all of which made audio more portable and convenient but at some cost. It is very clear to both my senses and my intellect that too much compression really does damage sound quality ā€” no one disagrees with that part.

This all comes back to the sensory experience of how the body picks up vibrations:

Imagine youā€™re alone and frightened in the woods, in the dark, with threats nearby. Suddenly, crack! A twig snaps close by. At that moment, which would matter more to you: where the sound came from or what type of wood the twig was made of?

The best way to locate sounds is to use the whole body ā€” ears, skull, skin, even guts ā€” since the entire body contains vibration sensors. The brainā€™s main job is making sense of vibrations throughout the body, eyeballs to toes to eardrums, all consistent, all at once. One single vibratory image unified from skin and ears.

Headphones and earbuds fracture that unified sensory experience.

Softky explains that the digital sampling and compression associated with CD’s and MP3’s denies the information resolution the nervous system cares about. This is where analogue technologies are still superior.

In response to all this, Softky predicts the emergence of three new technologies that could change the world by reconnecting people with sound:

  • Devices that quantify sound the right way
  • Microtime recording and stereo
  • Micropresence = microtime telepresence

Alternatively, we could see a return to more ‘acoustic’ music concerts:

The best connection will always be a physical presence and proximity. I expect more ā€œacousticā€ music concerts, all-live musicians, no microphones or even hyper-flickering LED illumination. Acoustic dances. Acoustic conferences. It turns out the so-called ā€œemotional resonanceā€ people enjoy together really is a kind of neuromechanical resonance, aided by acoustics and reduced by reproduction. (Itā€™s best experienced in sacred spaces like churches, temples and Aurovilleā€™s Matrimandir. Live silence, like live music, will always connect people the way Neil Young hopes.

This reminds me of intimacy of La BlogothĆØque.

For more on sound and technology, Geoffrey Morrison discusses the problem with digital compression. This is also something discussed on Switched on Pop in an interview with Dallas Taylor.

3 responses on “šŸ“‘ How Science Got Sound Wrong”

  1. Welcome back for another month.
    On the family front, I took my daughters to the Fairy Park just out of Geelong, our eldest had her end of year music concert, while my wife was successful in application to become assistant principal next year.
    At work, I continued to balance the multiple roles of on-boarding new schools, supporting current schools and work through some of the issues associated with our workflows. The biggest challenge I find is that each party thinks you are their resource for the whole time, but we get by ā€“ just. I also attended the regional elearn meeting where I was lucky enough to touch base with Tony Richards and Kimberley Hall.
    Personally, I listened to a few new albums from Elbow, Nils Frahm and Angel Olsen, but to be honest, I spent more time reading. I was inspired by something Philip Roth said, which Craig Mod quoted in his newsletter:

    If you read a novel in more than two weeks you donā€™t read the novel really.

    I am thinking that I have not really been reading then. Therefore, I wondered through Martin Lindstromā€™s world of Small Data, reflected on Edward Snowdenā€™s Permanent Record, returned to Clive Thompsonā€™s Coders and also dived into Philip Glassā€™ memoir Words Without Music. With all this in mind, I have not really been doing a lot of long form writing, although I have a few drafts of things going.
    Here then are the links that really stood out to me this month:

    Education
    Sweeping changes to HSC and syllabus proposed by government review
    Jordan Baker reports on the proposed changes put forward by Geoff Masters in the NSW Curriculum Review Interim Report. Most importantly, this raised the question as to what the purpose of curriculum is.
    Sustaining School Organisational Change
    Mal Lee and Roger Broadie unpack the difference between driving initial change and sustaining it for the long term.
    After Babel: Designing for Community
    Sean Michael Morris unpacks the challenges associated with learning in online communities.
    Psychodata
    Ben Williamson disassembles the growing world of social and emotional learning.
    The Need for Transformational Learning is Long Overdue
    Val Margarit discusses the six steps she uses for encouraging heutagogical learning environments.
    Education before Regulation: Empowering Students to Question Their Data Privacy
    Autumm Caines and Erin Glass discuss data privacy and the importance of educating students about the topic.

    Technology
    Is Amazon Unstoppable?
    Charles Duhigg takes a deep dive into the world of Amazon, including day one thinking, relentless improving, copying culture and the spectre of anti-trust.
    The strange world of TikTok: viral videos and Chinese censorship
    Anushka Asthana and Alex Hern discuss the censorship associated with social video app TikTok and its timeless algorithmic feed.
    How memes got weaponized: A short history
    Joan Donovan unpacks the history associated with memes.
    Is Anyone Going to Get Rich off of Email Newsletters?
    Kaitlyn Tiffany explores the ever evolving world of newsletters.
    Social Media Has Not Destroyed a Generation
    Lydia Denworth argues that although people like Jean Twenge might be right about the impact of social media on health, correlation does not always equal conclusion. More research is required to better understand some of the nuances.
    Want to make a podcast? Here are five things we learnt at OzPod 2019
    Kellie Riordan highlights five takeaways from the OzPod 2019 Conference.

    Reflection
    Inside the Big Day Out
    Through a 5-part series, Gemma Pick documents the history of The Big Day Out from its early beginnings in the 90s to its capitulation in 2015.
    Planning for a problematic future
    Edwina Stott explores the strategy of scenario planning as a way of responding to the complex, complicated and often confounding futures.
    ā€˜Itā€™s a bit Pompeii-likeā€™: The unexpected ā€˜buried blocksā€™ of Melbourne
    Zach Hope provides a fascinating insight into the early years of Melbourne where some houses were buried in an effort to raise the swampy areas.
    A million people are jailed at Chinaā€™s gulags. I managed to escape. Hereā€™s what really goes on inside
    David Stavrou paints a picture of life inside of a Xinjiang ā€˜reeducationā€™ camp. This is based on a testimony provided by Sayragul Sauytbay, a teacher who escaped from China and was granted asylum in Sweden.
    Annika Smethurst: ā€˜Worry is my new normalā€™
    Annika Smethurst provides a sobering account of life after the Australia Federal Policeā€™s raids and what is on the line when reporting on the government and security.
    How Science Got Sound Wrong
    William Softky explains how vinyl is better than digital music.

    Read Write Respond #046
    So that was October for me, how about you? As always, happy to hear.

    Cover Image via JustLego101

    Also on:

  2. I have used Google Music for the last few years, however it is going away. This has been on the books for awhile. As the lights are slowly turned off on another Google product, here is my reflection on the options and my choice moving forward.
    YouTube Music
    The most obvious choice is to simply move over to YouTube Music. As Ron Amadeo shared, the demise of Google Music is about YouTube as anything else.

    Googleā€™s decision to kill Google Play Music is mostly about YouTube. For a while, it was negotiating two separate music licenses with the record labelsā€”one for YouTube music videos and another for Google Music radioā€”so combining them makes some amount of sense. In a Google Play Music versus YouTube fight, the service that pulls in $15 billion a year (YouTube) is going to win. YouTube Music pulls songs from YouTube, and Google can consolidate into a single license.

    @arstechnica https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/10/rip-google-play-music-2011-2020/

    https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/Blogger-Peer-Review/quotebacks@1/quoteback.js
    Therefore, a few months ago, I transferred my data over to YouTube Music to try it out.
    The one thing I initially noticed was that there is some confusion between ā€˜YouTubeā€™ and ā€˜YouTube Musicā€™. I had some pre-exisiting music related playlists in YouTube. These too were available in YouTube Music, often meaning that I could listen to live performances without also watching them. I think this would sort itself out in the long run as my playlists become a bit more consolidated. However, it was an initial point of confusion.
    Another observation was the way in which YouTube Music organises artists. For those without a channel, YouTube automatically generates a channel. This means without an official channel, YouTube Music incidentally mashes together different bands/artists with the same name. Look at the Canadian synthpop band DIANA for example, their collection is combined with other random DIANAā€™s which I am pretty sure are not the real DIANA band. This is a problem also carried over from Google Music.
    Bandcamp
    Damon Krukowski recently explored the question as to whether Bandcamp is a streaming platform. The reality is that it is not. Although it provides such features, of being to access music across devices, the focus seems to be on creating a marketplace for people to purchase music, as well as merchandise. Although I have stepped up my purchases on the platform, not every band is on Bandcamp, therefore this is still primarily about supporting artists.
    Own Your Own Music
    I have read about people setting up their own personal music servers. I imagine I could probably do this with Reclaim Cloud. The other alternative is to go complete old school and scrap streaming altogether and just load purchases to my devices as I used to do. To be honest, it just isnā€™t a priority for me right now. I guess I have become far too wedded to the cloud, even with all the hidden costs.
    Spotify
    My last stop was Spotify. In regards to user experience, YouTube Music and Spotify seem very similar.
    One point of difference between the two platforms is the ability for children to tune in. Although my daughter was able to create her own account to connect with the family subscription associated with Google Music, this was not possible with YouTube Music. I would assume this relates to the fact that YouTube accounts are restricted to 13+, but am not completely sure. Alternatively, Spotify has created a separate app for children. Although this does not allow access to all artists and songs, it does mean at least allow my daughter to have full control without needing to create an account.

    Thereā€™s a library of 8,000 tracks, judged by Spotify staff to be age-appropriate to children and teens, with more songs to be added over the appā€™s lifespan.
    @TechRadar https://www.techradar.com/au/news/spotify-kids-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-child-friendly-music-app

    https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/Blogger-Peer-Review/quotebacks@1/quoteback.js
    In addition to this, there are still some artists and albums available on Spotify that are not necessarily available on YouTube Music.

    In the end, I ended up going with Spotify. This included using Tune My Music to bring across some of my playlists from Google Music. Maybe in the future I will resurrect my music files and create my own server? As I am apprehensive about the data mined and the move into DNA. Or maybe I will join the (re)turn to vinyl in a search for an optimal experience. I guess we will see.
    As always, comments welcome.

    If you enjoy what you read here, feel free to sign up for my monthly newsletter to catch up on all things learning, edtech and storytelling.
    Share this:

    Email
    Reddit
    Twitter
    Pocket
    Tumblr
    LinkedIn

    Like this:

    Like Loading…



    Moving On From Google Music
    by Aaron Davis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *