Reply to Ian Guest on Groups, Communities, Collectives or …?

Replied Groups, communities, collectives or …? by Ian Guest (Marginal Notes)
Twitter is classified by Stephen Downes as a Group, based on the fact that power is centralised and held by the platform, rather than being in the hands of the participants. Membership is closed by dint of the requirement to create an account and there are rules which members are obliged to follow. In addition to the criteria he uses to disti...
This is an interesting discussion Ian. I wonder if you have read Teaching Crowds by Jon Dron and Terry Anderson. I have summarised it here. However I think that this graphic captures it:

A representation of the ideas presented in Teaching Crowds
Graphic taken from a presentation at GAFE Summit, 2016

What intrigues me about labeling Twitter as a ‘group’ ignores the many features built into the platform and the affordances they allow. For example, the focus on hashtags allows for the formation of ‘Communities of Interest’, while lists can be used to develop ‘Circles’. Maybe Downes’ reference to ‘sameness’ is assocaited with the idea of ‘templated self’.

A self or identity that is produced through various participation architectures, the act of producing a virtual or digital representation of self by filling out a user interface with personal information.

It has definitely left me wondering.

2 responses on “Reply to Ian Guest on Groups, Communities, Collectives or …?”

    1. I am not sure how much labels matter in the thick of things Ian, but they can be useful in telling a particular story. Not sure in regards to the assemblage though.
      In regards to ‘templated self’ I came by it via Audrey Watters, other than that I am unsure.

Mentions

  • IaninSheffield

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *