Today’s shared language around innovation is emotive rather than procedural; we use innovation to highlight the desired positive results of our efforts rather than to identify anything specific about our effort (products, processes or policies). The predominant use of innovation is to highlight the value and future-readiness of whatever the speaker supports, which is why opposite sides of issues in education (see school choice, personalized learning, etc.) use innovation in promoting their ideologies.
This touches upon Audrey Watters message to respect history, rather than live in the ever present that so many try to perpetuate.
3 responses on “📑 The risks of treating ‘academic innovation’ as a discipline (opinion)”
Mentions