๐Ÿ“‘ The Antitrust Case Against Facebook: a turning point in the debate over Big Tech and monopoly

Bookmarked The Antitrust Case Against Facebook: a turning point in the debate over Big Tech and monopoly (Boing Boing)

Srinivasan’s paper is a sprightly and readable thing, but it clocks in at 80-some pages, so you may prefer herย summarizing articlefor the Institute for New Economic Thinking. Either way, take note of the legal maneuvers she makes, which go even farther than Kahn did: Srinivasan makes a solid case that even the nearly useless Reagan version of antitrust law can be stretched to fit Facebook, in light of the case she lays out.

Cory Doctorow discusses Dina Srinivasan’s new paper The Antitrust Case Against Facebook published in the Berkeley Business Law Journal. Srinivasan documents the rise of the platform and how it would not have been possible in a pre-Reagan era. The association between monopoly and surveillance is also explored:

Srinivasan’s history of Facebook’s surveillance rollout makes link between monopoly and surveillance clear. For its first ten years, Facebook sold itself as the pro-privacy alternative to systems like Myspace, Orkut, and other competitors, repeatedly promising that it wouldn’t track or analyze its users activity. As each of Facebook’s competitors disappeared, Facebook advanced its surveillance technology, often running up against user resistance. But as the number Facebook alternatives could go declined — because Facebook crushed them or bought them — Facebook’s surveillance became more aggressive. Today, with Facebook as the sole dominant social network, people who leave Facebook end up joining Instagram, a Facebook subsidiary.

This is a topic Tim Wu, Charles Duhigg and Lina Khan have discussed. A summary of the paper was also published by the Institute for New Economic Thinking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *