2/ And for all the handwringers, there are (& have always been) homes where there are no books, papers or magazines. Are devices not one way that these children are now exposed to text? I’m not a fan of uncritical embrace of technology in schls but some more balance wld be good
— Linda J. Graham (@drlindagraham) November 11, 2019
Our research suggests that research on differentiation can and should improve, if the understanding of the practice is itself to improve.
Far too many studies are conducted without a coherent and theoretically informed definition to guide the development of instruments or to provide an appropriate lens through which to analyse the data collected. Having now read a vast number of articles, each claiming to be about differentiation, we observe that new research on this topic must build from and improve on previous studies. This is important to avoid researchers approaching the topic with the assumption that there is common agreement as to what differentiation is, or proposing their own new definition.
To achieve this, we believe future research on differentiation could:
- clearly define differentiation as a range of evidence-based practices that teachers can use to meet the needs of all learners in heterogeneous classrooms
- investigate the planning and enactment of these practices in both primary and secondary general education settings
- use rigorous mixed-method research designs capable of assessing the adequacy of those practices for meeting the full range of individual learning needs, whilst determining the effect on students’ engagement, educational experiences, and academic outcomes; and
- monitor implementation fidelity and the impact on teachers’ work.