Considering the success of self-regulation as a focus, could we now try to maintain that self-reg culture while shifting the focus to growth in reading? He agreed that there had been an awesome success with self-reg and that we had a strong platform of literacy (especially reading) that we could build on. With Mark’s positive experience with reading instruction and self-regulation, along with his strong relationships with staff, he could help lead us to shift from a focus on self-reg to a focus on reading.
We humans do not do well when someone whose intentions are unclear tells us where we stand, how good we “really” are, and what we must do to fix ourselves. We excel only when people who know us and care about us tell us what they experience and what they feel, and in particular when they see something within us that really works.
Focusing people on their shortcomings doesn’t enable learning; it impairs it.
Buckingham and Goodall highlight three theories that those who believe in feedback as often accepts as true:
- That other people are more aware than you are of your weaknesses, and that the best way to help you, therefore, is for them to show you what you cannot see for yourself.
- That the process of learning is like filling up an empty vessel: You lack certain abilities you need to acquire, so your colleagues should teach them to you.
- That great performance is universal, analyzable, and describable, and that once defined, it can be transferred from one person to another, regardless of who each individual is.
In response, they propose a number of strategies to support the development of others, including:
- Look for outcomes
- Replay your instinctive reactions
- Explore the present, past, and future
This is something problem of feedback.about too, discussing the