“Minimum Viable Product” is a venerable Silicon Valley concept. It argues that if you’ve got an idea for an app, you should release it early — when it’s got barely just enough features to be useful. Sure, the app might only do one thing. But if it does that one thing well, get it out there.
That way you get ahead of the competition. It also helps you figure out if anyone really wants or needs your product. “Don’t knock yourself adding a ton of features at first — just release the basic idea and see if people like it.”
Just figure out the minimum number of things a product should do, and begin there.
… and make it “Maximum Viable Product”
From little things big things grow?
Getting better is the path to better.
Great reflection Andrea. Building collaborative teams is hard enough, adding competition into the mix never helps in creating the culture required.
I remember having a ‘build it and they will come‘ approach to collaboration. However, my experience since is that there are .
Importantly, coaching is not a stand-alone solution or silver bullet. In my school we have worked towards a differentiated model of in-house professional learning in which staff have voice and choice in taking advantage of a process that most suits their career stage and needs. These options include different types of coaching by different types of coaches, but also more advisory, mentor-style relationships, and also collaborative groups that run like PLCs or journal clubs.