FutureNever is a place where your past, present and future collide – in the FutureNever the quantum of your past experiences become your superpower
Michael Dwyer suggests that FutureNever has more darkness, less varnish and more stylistic confusion.
Manic may be the best single-word answer to describe his new album. FutureNever has some of the whimsical, baroque threads of his last few albums ā The Dissociatives with Paul Mac, his own Talk, DREAMS with Empire of the Sunās Luke Steele ā but a lot more darkness. Thereās more purge, less varnish, more stylistic confusion and a default pitch that seems to come from the thick of struggle rather than the bliss of creative liberation.
While Andrew Trendell argues that what makes FutureNever ‘unmistakably Johns’ is the sense of vulnerability, curiosity and adventure.
While thereās a lot of Daniel Johns at his best here, this isnāt āThe Best Of Daniel Johnsā. Thereās rock bravado throughout, but you wonāt get a whiff of āFrogstompā. Styles and eras clash, but āNeon Ballroomā it aināt. There is, however, a vulnerability, curiosity and adventure that makes āFutureNeverā unmistakably Johns. That kid who once asked you to wait for tomorrow is living in it today.
Nathan Jolly explains how the album sounds like a ‘number of separate projects played on shuffle’.
FutureNever feels like a number of separate projects played on shuffle. There are four songs that seem like offcuts from an aborted operetta, a few dance collaborations that belong on Ministry of Sound mixes, and a handful of tracks that split the difference between the slinky electro of his debut solo album, Talk, and his bright and loopy Dissociatives work with Paul Mac. Thereās also a lot more guitar shredding than expected, despite this being very much not a guitar record.
Tyler Jenke elaborates on this in a Rolling Stone profile, in which he explains how the album is a combination of three different ideas.
Never one to stop writing or composing (he admits to having thousands of demos around the place), three separate records (which will remain unheard) had managed to make themselves apparent over the years. One, dubbed āThe Modern Punk Recordā, featured an electronic punk sound; anotherāāThe Opera Recordāāwas self-explanatory; while āThe Modern Electronica Recordā featured the sort of futuristic R&B sound he had ventured into with 2015ās Talk.
Johns explains that he is not cohesive and that the album reflects who he is.
āIām sure Iām going to get slayed in the press, because it doesnāt sound cohesive,ā he admits, casually brushing off memories of past criticisms. āBut Iām not cohesive.
āSome people are going to be perplexed because itās not an experience of a record that Iāve ever done before. Itās more a collection of stuff that Iāve been doing while everyone thought I was dormant.ā
At the end of the day, writing for Johns is about figuring things out.
I write music because Iām trying to figure out ways to get the shapes in my head into a sonic form. I donāt think Iāll ever stop because I donāt think Iāll ever get what I want.