Marginalia
The problem with threatening people is that in order for it to continue to work, you have to continue to threaten them
If weāre trying to encourage people to care about their work, about their world, is it practical to have it only work when someone is threatening them?
Once we jointly answer questions like āwhy would people care about thisā and āhow does this support people starting to care about this for the first timeā and āwill this stop people who care now from caringā, we have a place to work from.
Iām in this business because i think i might be able to help, here and there, with trying to build a culture of thinkers.
Great post Dave. It often feels like the dialogue around āengagementā, whatever engagement actually is, centres around the teacher. After the year that I have had I am moving towards a more open understanding of āengagementā that incorporates the whole space. Starting with ādo you care?ā is not only simply, but to the point. This offers a great entry point to start an ongoing discussion. I wonder though if those students who may have been metaphorically beaten to oblivion, who say āthey careā as that is the answer required, but deep down seem to have forgotten what it is to care, what can be done for them. The supposed ālost causesā. I guess the only threat that should be made in classes is that you must make a choice?
Also on:
Aaron the idea of students lying about caring is always a possibility š Our job, i suppose is to see through that
I don’t think they “lie” about caring. They just don’t know what it is to “care” about anything. They do care passionately about all sorts of things, just nothing to do with “school” as they know it.
Andrea, Adam Grantās discussion of care and āfeeling joy of progressā reminds me of Dave Cormierās post about ācareā as learningās first principle.
Also on: