Most ironically, perhaps, the more content we churn out for all of these platforms, the less valuable all of our content becomes. There’s simply too much stuff. The problem isn’t information overload so much as “perspective abundance.” We may need to redefine “discipline” from the ability to write and publish something every day to the ability hold back. What if people started to produce content when they had actually something to say, rather than coming up with something to say in order to fill another slot?
Source: Breaking from the Pace of the Net by Douglas Rushkoff
To me, this touches on Dave White’s idea of “elegant lurking”
The Elegant Lurker can be much more engaged than the noisy contributor and not being visible doesn’t mean you aren’t present.
Source: Elegant Lurking by Dave White
Continuing with his reflection on the challenges of creating, Rushkoff discusses using AI to help him with the creation of a story and wonders if AI is actually taking all the fun stuff?
I was becoming the servant to the AI and the AI was doing the most fun part of the whole process, the actual coming up with the stuff.
Source: Breaking from the Speed of the Net by Douglas Rushkoff
This is something that Scott Stephens and Waleed Aly discuss on The Mindfield podcast, with Stephens worried about what is lost when we no longer spend the time.
Rushkoff then discusses the realisation that maybe the best use of AI is to use the feedback to know where not to write, to know where you have sunk into cliche:
The real value is to use what the AI produced to know how not to write.
Mentions