📑 ‘Back to basics’ is not our education cure – it’s where we’ve gone wrong

Bookmarked ‘Back to basics’ is not our education cure – it’s where we’ve gone wrong (The Sydney Morning Herald)

NAPLAN, by contrast, does test basic literacy and numeracy. However, unlike our declining PISA performance, there has been no downward slide in NAPLAN results. If anything, the year 3 NAPLAN cohort from 2013 did better than their counterparts from five years earlier.


Whatever the reason for the decline in PISA results, it is not mirrored by a corresponding decline in NAPLAN scores for the same cohorts of students. So what is going on?

Richard Holden and Adrian Piccoli discuss the difference between NAPLAN and PISA. They also explain that a ‘return to basics’ is actually counter-intuitive when it comes to improving PISA results, which are designed to focus on workplace skills:

In an increasingly globalised and automated world, problem-solving ability is the scarce skill. It is the skill that will generate the long-run productivity growth required to maintain high standards of living.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *