πŸ“‘ Agnotology and Epistemological Fragmentation

Bookmarked Agnotology and Epistemological Fragmentation
In a talk at the Digital Public Library of America conference (DPLAfest), danah Boyd lays out the information war that we are currently involved in. Doug Belshaw added some thoughts to this discussion, highlighting the particular challenges associated with networks.

Marginalia

Epistemology is the term that describes how we know what we know. Most people who think about knowledge think about the processes of obtaining it. Ignorance is often assumed to be not-yet-knowledgeable. But what if ignorance is strategically manufactured? What if the tools of knowledge production are perverted to enable ignorance?

What’s at stake right now is not simply about hate speech vs. free speech or the role of state-sponsored bots in political activity. It’s much more basic. It’s about purposefully and intentionally seeding doubt to fragment society. To fragment epistemologies. This is a tactic that was well-honed by propagandists.

One of the best ways to seed agnotology is to make sure that doubtful and conspiratorial content is easier to reach than scientific material. And then to make sure that what scientific information is available, is undermined. One tactic is to exploit β€œdata voids.” These are areas within a search ecosystem where there’s no relevant data; those who want to manipulate media purposefully exploit these. Breaking news is one example of this. Another is to co-opt a term that was left behind, like social justice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *