Here are 5 tests which together I think are almost necessary and sufficient for an interesting and general trend.
- The scope is world, not categorically restricted to economy or art or US politics
- The trend must be new β it must weave a new strand into world history
- The trend must already be robustly in evidence
- The trend must have enough momentum to persist for a while
- There must be markers of emergent coherent adaptation
Reflecting on the current situation, Rao suggests that we are currently in a phase where we are in something of a lull, that is always threatening.
The world is asleep, but actively dreaming. Often fever-dreaming. But the body politic of the world is in the rigor mortis of REM sleep. It cannot act to unleash the built-up energy.
Psychohistorical tenuousness is world history dreaming about being, without progressing to becoming. All adjacent possible, no actuality.